Thomas Chatterton Manuscript Project
Key People
Herbert Croft
1751 - 1816
Chatterton in Croft's Love & Madness
1780 4th edition
Herbert Croft's, Love and Madness, when it comes to Chatterton, is a hugely important book. It is a source of much of what we know about Chatterton.
​
I have read five of the seven known editions and can say that they all include transcripts of some of Chatterton's private 'letters', along with references to his life and works; I believe this applies to all editions. To read the various editions and my breakdown of the 5th edition : View
Herbert Croft : Biography
(From 1797, The Rev. Sir H. C. Bart.)
I have no wish to write a bio of Herbert Croft, or to use AI to 'assist' me, so, direct from Wiki via the 1911 edition of Encyclopædia Britannica, is my slightly adapted version of the life of Herbert Croft; I have not amended any of the 'facts' in my adapted version below, but have removed sections not relevant to our story, and added a few rather enjoyable links throughout this page.
​
'Croft was born at Dunster Park, Berkshire, son of the son of Herbert Croft and Elizabeth Young [coincidentally, Young was the maiden name of Chatterton's mother]. He matriculated at University College, Oxford, in March 1771, and was subsequently entered at Lincoln's Inn. He was called to the bar, but in 1782 returned to Oxford with a view to preparing for holy orders.
​
In 1786 he received the vicarage of Prittlewell, Essex, but he remained at Oxford for some years accumulating materials for a proposed English dictionary. Croft spent years on this project and he also took on preparation work made by Joseph Priestley. However, despite compiling thousands of entries not found in other dictionaries, the project was finally abandoned because of a failure to find sufficient subscribers.
​
He was twice married, and on the day after his second wedding day he was imprisoned at Exeter for debt.
​
He then retired to Hamburg, and two years later his library was sold. He had succeeded in 1797 to the baronetcy, but not to the estates, of a distant cousin, Sir John Croft, 4th Baronet. He returned to England in 1800, but went abroad once more in 1802. He lived near Amiens at a house owned by Lady Mary Hamilton, the daughter of Alexander Leslie, 5th Earl of Leven. Later he removed to Paris, where he died on 26 April 1816.
​
In some of his numerous literary enterprises he had the help of Charles Nodier. Croft wrote the Life of Edward Young inserted in Samuel Johnson's Lives of the Poets.'
​
To read the untroubled Wiki version : View
​
To read the Encyclopædia Britannica version : View
​
See also Nichols's Illustrations of the Literary History..., 1828, for another bio of Herbert Croft : View. '
Love & Madness - The Book
Love and Madness, a Story too true, in a series of letters between Parties whose names could perhaps be mentioned were they less known or less lamented; was published in 1780.
​
The portraits above are of Martha Ray (1746 – 7 April 1779) and James Hackman (1752, hanged 19 April 1779). The one thing to note from the above dates, is that they didn't hang about in those days - 12 days from the fatal shooting and Hackman was hanged. I am guessing here, but the black circle on Hackman's temple must represent a dressing, which was applied to hide the injury caused when he attempted to kill himself murdering Martha. Do note that Love & Madness does not include portraits or other engravings.
The book, which passed through at least seven editions, narrates the passion of the soldier-turned-clergyman James Hackman for Martha Ray, mistress of the Earl of Sandwich (the Earl is also, possibly, the father of William Henry Ireland). Martha was shot and killed by Hackman, her lover, as she was leaving Covent Garden in 1779.
You might also like to read the following volume for a different slant on the case, but be warned, the last few pages blame Martha for bringing her murder upon herself - now, that's what I call madness! : 'The case and memoirs of the late Rev. Mr. James Hackman, and of his acquaintance with the late Miss Martha Ray: with a commentary on his conviction, ... And also, some thoughts on lunacy and suicide, ...' 1779 : View
Love & Madness - The Chatterton Connection
Love and Madness is important because it contains a wealth of information about Chatterton, along with transcripts of some of Chatterton's private letters, which Croft had obtained under false pretences from Chatterton's mother and sister. He persuaded Sarah and Mary to lend him the letters, with a promise to return them within the hour, instead he left Bristol taking the letters with him. The next they knew of it was in 1780, when they discovered that the letters had been published in Love and Madness.
​
Give Croft his due, for he did eventually return most of the letters and also paid £10 to be shared between mother and daughter. All in all, it was a dastardly deed by a man of his standing, a man destined to become The Reverend Sir Herbert Croft, Bart., but he wasn't going to get off lightly - Robert Southey would make sure of that, and in the most public way possible - read on:
Robert Southey v Herbert Croft
The Monthly Magazine & A Letter from Denmark
When Robert Southey learned how badly Herbert Croft had treated Chatterton's Mother, Sarah, and his sister, Mary, he was driven to rush into print and publish a detailed report of Croft's underhand behaviour. The report, complete with copies of the correspondence between Croft and Mary, appeared in The Monthly Magazine, which was published in 1780. Read it in full below, or read it online in The Monthly Magazine : View.
Robert Southey on Herbert Croft
'Statement of Facts relative to Chatterton'
The Monthly Magazine
Herbert Croft to Robert Southey
A Letter from Denmark
Croft had no real choice, he couldn't let it lie, and so he went on the attack. He wrote a reply via the Gentleman's Magazine, it was spread over three monthly issues. View : February Issue ; March Issue ; April Issue.
He afterwards printed it separately as Chatterton and "Love and Madness," - A Letter from Denmark, 1800. Apparently 'This tract evades the main accusation, and contains much abuse of Southey.' Read it online : View
A big Thank You to The Johns Hopkins University Sheridan Libraries for sharing so many Chatterton editions, including Herbert Croft’s A Letter from Denmark : Click title page to view the book.
Chatterton
in
Biographia Britannica
It seems that Herbert Croft had agreed to write an account of Chatterton for Biographia Britannica, vol. iii., 1784, and also for 1789, however, for some unknown reason, he missed whatever deadline he was working to, and, as a result, Kippis had to give the job to George Gregory.
The Preface to Biographia Britannica, vol 3, 1784, where Chatterton had to be given a special mention due to Croft failing to meet his deadline.
Chatterton, instead of his illustrious and fortunate position next to Chaucer (see above), has been shifted to volume iv, where he is now only part of an appendix. He also had to wait another five years before he achieved the ultimate claim to fame, being recorded for all time in Biographia Britannica.
The volume was published in 1789, complete with George Gregory's version of Chatterton's life and works : View
The same year as Chatterton finally appeared in Biographia, 1789, George Gregory also published his book 'The Life of Thomas Chatterton' : View
Herbert Croft
Other Works & Sundry Items
An Unfinished Letter to William Pitt
New English Language Dictionary
'In 1788 Croft addressed a letter to William Pitt on the subject of a new dictionary. He criticized Samuel Johnson's efforts, and in 1790 he claimed to have collected 11,000 words used by excellent authorities but omitted by Johnson. Two years later he issued proposals for a revised edition of Johnson's Dictionary, but subscribers were lacking and his 200 vols. of manuscript remained unused. Croft was a good scholar and linguist, and the author of some curious books in French.'
The above book is currently for sale on Biblio : View
The Love LetterS of Mr H. and Miss R.
1775-1779
Ah, Gilbert Burgess, the man who insisted that love letters in Love and Madness were real and then went into print in 1895 to prove it :
The Love Letters of Mr H. and Miss R., edited by Burgess from Croft's book. : View.
Love & Madness
The Seven Editions
First Edition - 1780
Published London : No View
First Edition - 1780
Published London : No View
This is an interesting copy of the first edition. It is included because it has "pencil markings and annotations in code to much of the work, with some blank leaves bound in at the end and a manuscript note in ink concerning the author, also a note at the end in code and latin on the rear pastedown. It also has an ink signature 'Glynne' and an engraved bookplate of Munden House, Herts, to the front pastedown. ... Intriguingly, it is the passages concerning Chatterton which are marked and annotated in code."
It sold at a Forum auction in 2017. Hopefully, the new owner will be in touch and we can include a full report on this volume.
3rd Edition - 1780
Published London : No View
x
5th Edition - 1780
Published Dublin : View
1st Irish edition, fifth edition overall.
​​Includes 'Memoirs of Miss Ray,' not in the London editions.
​
​
Includes 'Memoirs of Miss Ray,' not in the London editions.
​
​Strange that the fact this is the 5th edition, is only mentioned in the postscript, p.333.
The 5th edition is prefered as our working document.
​
-
1786 : 6th? edition : Published in Dublin : No View
My assumption of this being the 6th edition is based purely on the date published. All of the Dublin copies listed on ESTC are in America and Canada, and are declared to be the 4th edition, which makes no sense unless you treat the Dublin and English editions separately.
​
-
1809 : 7th? edition : Published Ipswich : Raw / Longman / Hurst... No View
A smaller book with fewer pages than previous editions.
(I do have a copy, so if anyone is desperate for any of the contents do feel free to ask).
Love and Madness 1786, 5th edition.
Analysis of pages related to Chatterton:
Letter XLVI : Pages 124-128 : View
-
The first mention of 'Chatterton' in this volume. Four lines only from The Execution of Sir Charles Bawdin (nothing else), on page 126.
​​
Letter LI : Pages 140 - 154 : View
-
140 : Start of letter LI, (nothing Chatterton)
-
141 -142 : Croft has no doubts that Chatterton wrote the whole.
-
143 -144 : Chatterton (mini-biography).
-
144 : Croft states that Chatterton's father was a schoolmaster and Sexton & that he died 'very soon after, if not before, the birth of his son.' Chatterton 'who indisputably received no other education than what he picked up at a charity-school at a place called St Augustine's Back in Bristol. [Croft is wrong on a few points, which you will know having read the other biographies, for example, Chatterton's father was not a Sexton].
​
-
144/145 : Chatterton's letter to the newspaper re the 'Bridge Narrative'
​
-
146 : Croft is sure Chatterton knew Latin: Dunhelmus Bristoliensis. First mention of Barrett and Catcott 'To these gentlemen he produced, between Oct. 1768, and April 1770...all Rowley's poems, except the "ballad of Charitie.' Chatterton only produced two 'originals' the rest were all 'transcripts.'
​
-
147 : Barrett and Catcott were not generous to Chatterton or his family. Mrs Chatterton received £5, Mary had her whitlowed finger cured by Barrett.
​
-
148 : Antiquarian at Cambridge states Chatterton, had he lived, could not have escaped hanging.
​
-
149 - 150 : Chatterton was 'addicted to women, like all youths of strong imaginations'
​
-
150/1 : Chatterton wrote on both sides of the question. Croft quotes from Memoirs of a Sad Dog, "As I know the art of Curlism pretty well,..." signed Harry Wildfire; this is a long piece spread over two monthly sections in the Town and Country magazine: July & August.
​
-
151/2/3 : Walpole is not blameable for the life or death of Chatterton. Croft quotes from Walpole's "A letter to the editor of Chatterton's Miscellanies." Thomas Warton. Joseph Warton.
​
-
154 : A few lines from The Story of Canynge.
​
-
155 : Croft: "..preserve the false spellings and stops. Let Chatterton's sister tell her own story in her own way." "...forgery. For Chatterton's sake, the English language should add another word to its dictionary." Croft also mentions song to Aella, & the chorus to Godwin.
-
156 : Macpherson & Ossian. Lady Anne Lindsay & Auld Robin Gray. Quotes son of Sirach ‘When a rich man speaketh, every man holdeth his tongue: and lo! What he says is extolled to the clouds: but if a poor man speak, they say, What fellow is this? Chatterton. Rowley. Catcott. 'Chatterton's father was a bit of a poet.' Sarah and Mary might have believed ‘that injured Justice demanded their lives at Tyburn, for being the mother and sister of him who was suspected to have forged the poems of Rowley.
-
157 : Croft: ‘With regard to the fact, the mother and sister either believe, or pretend to believe, with the pewterer, that all of Rowley’s poems came out of the old chest in the church. The case is, none of the three knows any thing of the matter.’
​
-
158 : Junius.
-
159 : 'Psalmanaazar and D’eon are not to be compared with Chatterton.' John the Painter (Aka. James Aitken), hanged for arson in 1777, some observations on Rowley's poems among his papers (according to Croft)?
-
160/1 : Mary sent Chatterton a catalogue of the books he had read, to the amount of many hundreds. Astrea Brokage. Town and Country mag Jan 1770.
​
-
[.QE!.] Mary’s letter to Croft, starts: “Concious, of my own inabilitys to write to a man of letters…” [.QE!.] E.H.W.Meyerstein states 'I don't know if Croft altered Mrs. Newton's spelling, but in no autograph letter of her's that I have seen is it so illiterate as in this piece justicative of September 22, 1778. The others were supervised, perhaps.'
​
-
165 : Croft: "...you will next read the earliest production of Chatterton [Apostate Will is on page 168]. which I have been able to find [Apostate Will : see p.168 below]. It is transcribed from an old pocketbook in his mother’s possession. It appears to be his first, perhaps his only, copy of it; and is evidently his handwriting. By the date he was eleven years and almost five months old."
​
-
[.QE!.] Croft goes on to talk about apologies made by or for two other poets when ‘young.’ He compares Addison’s early work, when he was 27, and Chaulieu, a french, fucking poet at forty. (Yes I know it should be ‘sucking’ and not ‘fucking, but I am convinced it was a play on words by Croft, using the long ‘s’ to his advantage).
​
-
166 : Compares Pope at twelve, Cowley at thirteen.
​
-
[.QE!.] The idea that Chatterton had no tutor/mentor and that his family had no abilities, runs through various editors/biographers. Basil Cottle calls Sarah a ‘nonentity,’ which is too unfair for words! Although, it is possible that Basil was using the word ‘nonentity’ to mean ‘not known.’ However, Croft has no excuse with the following: When we read the ode which Pope wrote at twelve and another by Cowley at thirteen, we are apt to suspect a parent, friend, or tutor, of an amiable dishonesty....Suspicions of this nature touch not Chatterton. He knew no tutor, no friend, no parent at least no parent who could correct or assist him.’ Really? It's time we put the record straight and instead of thinking the worst of Sarah, we look at what she achieved: firstly, she was foremost in Chatterton’s development, having taught him to read and, judging by the letters home, was loved dearly by him! She got him enrolled into Colston's School, which came complete with an apprenticeship; furthermore, according to Mary, he was never two nights together without visiting his family. It is clear to me that Sarah never stopped doting on her son, otherwise why would he continue to visit the family home so regularly.
​
-
'[Croft] : Chatterton was the Sexton’s son' [which we know is incorrect] ...Satire was his fort, if anything can be called his fort, who excelled in every thing he undertook.... And ‘...Catcott has another later poem of Chatterton’s, called, I think, ‘The Exhibition.’ The church here also supplied his indignation with a subject. But, as the satire is rather severe, and the characters are living, Catcott does not permit it to be copied.'
​
-
167 : [.QE!.] Croft compares Chatterton to Milton because they both had that rare ability of being musical. Mentions The Exhibition.
​
-
168/9 : Apostate Will : includes pronunciation tip: ‘The e in key is, I believe, in the Somersetshire pronunciation, a.
​
-
170 : Happiness
-
[Croft] : Though it may not be next in order of composition, for I shall send you nothing which is already printed.
​​
-
[.QE!.] According to Taylor, the poem misses the last two lines: The Saint and Sinner Fool and Wise attain, An equal Share of Easiness and Pain. Finis. Catcott in B5315, has curst instead of first (Croft) in line 36, Taylor also has curst p.404. Catcott also misses out two lines (65 and 66 in T, P.405): Then what avails the anxious spitting Pain, Thy Laugh-provoking Labours all are vain. [.QE!.] You can see why Catcott chose to ignore these two lines.
-
​The Resignation
-
(Linked to online edition). Sarah and Mary say that Chatterton's Sunday's were generally spent in walking alone, into the country round Bristol, as far as the day would allow him time to return before night. He never failed to bring home drawings of churches or something which had struck him. That he had a turn for drawing, you will see by the figure of a warrior (perhaps Aella) presenting a church on his knee...[??]. Chatterton's sketch of Beckford's statue [??]...of which an engraving is prefixed to his Miscellanies, and the Town and Country Magazine. Chatterton had acquired skills in heraldry, architecture, music; astronomy, surgery, &c. Burgum (I think), taught himself Latin and Greek.
​​
-
Catcott’s role in the Rowley / Chatterton story. Catcott is the man least to be believed. Chatterton believed that genius was no less common to a man and woman, than a pair of eyes or a nose, and asked his sister to improve herself in copying music, drawing, and everything which requires genius. Chatterton left Bristol for the first time in April 1770, never to return. Walpole.
​​
-
Chatterton’s 1st letter to his Mother, April 26th, 1770 : 'Here I am, safe, and in high spirits’. TP1064
-
page 193: Walpole.​
-
Chatterton’s 2nd letter to his Mother, May 6th, 1770 : ‘I am surprised that no letter has been sent to my last.'
-
TP1083
​​
-
Chatterton’s 3rd letter to his Mother, May 14th, 1770 : ‘Don't be surprised at the name of the place. I am not here as a prisoner.'
-
The 'King's Bench' Letter. TP1087
​​
-
Chatterton’s Letter to his Sister, May 30th, 1770
​
-
Chatterton’s Letter to his Sister, June 19th & 29th, 1770
​
-
Chatterton’s Letter to his Mother, July 8th, 1770
​​
-
Chatterton’s Letter to his Sister, July 11th, 1770
​
-
Chatterton’s Letter to his Sister, July 20th, 1770 : I am now about an Oratorio...'
​
No View YET: Pages 212
-
Memoirs of a Sad Dog - Harry Wildfire "But, alas ! happiness is of short duration;...
-
Published Town and Country Magazine, July, 1770. p.375
-
[Croft] : 'All the originals of his letters here printed, except the original of this last [20th July, which Croft was allowed to keep], are in the possession of his mother, or sister, who, I believe, are still living in Bristol, and keep little day-schools.'
-
[Croft] : quotes Duff who 'admits but three original geniuses in poetry, Homer, Ossian, and Shakespeare.'--- [Croft] : 'Would not Chatterton complete the triumvirate better than Ossian?
-
[.QE!.] Surely Croft should either replace Chatterton with Rowley, or Ossian with Macpherson. After all he knows that Macpherson is Ossian.
​
No View yet : Pages 213 - 2
-
213/4: By his letters you see he lodged first in Shoreditch; afterwards (when his employment made it necessary for him to frequent public places, I suppose) in Brook Street, Holborn. The man and woman where he first lodges are still living in the same house. He [Walmsley] is a plaisterer. They, and their nephew and a niece (the latter about as old as Chatterton would be now, the former three years younger), and Mrs. Ballance, who lodged in the house, and desired them to let Chatterton (her relation) lodge there also, have been seen. Mrs. Ballance says he was as proud as Lucifer. He very soon quarrelled with her for calling him "Cousin Tommy," ...He would often look steadfastly in a persons face, without speaking, or seeming to see the person, for quarter of an hour or more, till it was quite frightful...When Beckford died, he was perfectly frantic, and out of his mind; and said that he was ruined.
​​
-
215 : Mr Walmsley observed little in him, but that there was something manly and pleasing about him, and that he did not dislike the wenches.
​​
-
215 : Mrs Walmsley...she never saw any harm of him - he never mislisted her; but was always very civil
-
Mrs. Ballance; Beckford. Niece describes Chatterton. Catcott; Barrett. Gentleman's Magazine. Monthly Review etc.
​​
-
218 : Quotes nine lines from The Minstrel by James Beattie: And yet poor Edwin was no vulgar boy.
​​
-
220 : another nine lines from The Minstrel.
​​
-
221 : [Croft] : ...suicide is always holden up to shame. Chatterton...swallowed arsenick, in water, on the 24th August, 1770; and died in consequence thereof, the next day. He was buried in a shell, in the burying-ground of Shoe-lane workhouse.
​
-
221 : That he should have been driven to it by absolute want, though I don't say it was not so, is not very possible; since he never indulged himself in meat, and drank nothing but water,
​
​​
-
Still another 70 pages to analyse and list; have a go yourself pages 222 onwards : View
​​